In my previous
blogpost, I had shared my thoughts about “Commitment” being over-valued than
competence. In this blogpost, I am discussing Commitment, as I understand.
Commitment is to a cause (or
Dharma), whereas Loyalty is to a person or organization.
Today, many
corporate houses talk about Customer Loyalty, Employee Loyalty etc… Loyalty is
also rewarded much more than Commitment.
I feel strongly that
Commitment has to be nurtured more than Loyalty.
I am taking a few
pages from our epics Ramayan and Mahabharat to express my thoughts…
In Ramayan, when
Ravan abducted Sita, Vibheshan (Ravan’s brother), felt it was against Dharma
and decided to act. He was fully committed to Dharma.
He took the right actions and
in the right sequence too…
- He approached Ravan directly and requested him to return Sita to Rama. (first step: direct feedback)
- Finding no results, he talked to Ravan’s wife Mandodari, and requested her to talk to Ravan. (next steps: approaching influencers)
- Finding no results, he then spoke to Ravan’s sons.
- Finding no results, he approached the Council of Ministers and asked them to influence Ravan. (next step: approach formal roles, who are duty-bound to offer feedback)
- Then, finally, his commitment to Dharma overweighing, he left Lanka and joined Rama, where he found Dharma. (finally, when all else fails, take a firm stand and act)
Without Vibheshan’s
commitment to Dharma, Rama could not have won the war; given that Vibheshan
shared very critical information about Ravan and his team, at different times;
like information about Ahi/Mahi Ravan, or during the final encounter, sharing about Ravan’s
boons etc… (Never allow emotions to interfere with your actions that are attached
to Dharma)
Quite
unfortunately, in our culture, we value Loyalty much more than Commitment. We
have branded Vibheshan as a traitor—no one names ones son as Vibheeshan, in our
culture!!
In Mahabharat,
Karna was Loyal to Dhuriyidhana. He sided with Adharma, knowing full well about
the Dharmic principles. His Loyalty to Dhuriyodhana was also not complete! He
promised his mother that he would not kill anyone other than Arjuna—not a fair
promise to make, being on the other side!!
Many of us seem to
value Karna in high-esteem than Vibheshan!! I am perplexed on our
stand-points!!
In my consulting
experience, I have come across many Corporate Leaders who prefer Loyalists than
people who are actually committed to the Vision/Mission as set by the Board.
These committed people, rock the boat, express opposing points of view vocally,
stick to high personal standards on matters of ethics etc., at different times
and are also victimized at some point—whereas, Loyalists get away with accolades by
merely supporting their bosses!!
Time to think for
ourselves as Leaders!!
