Disturbing Trend

There is a disturbing trend that I see growing fast.

Owing to the explosion of imaging/video tools that are easily available, many innocent people seem to fall a victim to morphed images/videos that are held against them, by groups that seek out money or other favours in return. Many of these victims find it difficult to stand up and fight—given their own inner fears and lack of support from family/friends who choose to keep out or in some cases, add fuel to the fire!

I feel pained to see that many people in social media, who are attracted to see such images/videos posted—may be on film stars or politicians—keep “forwarding/liking”, without adequate due diligence on the underlying truth/facts or even pausing to think before “forwarding/liking” those images/videos!

Take the case of Swathi, who was working for Infosys, who got brutally murdered in the early hours in a railway station in Chennai—and there were many people around who either moved away or were mute witnesses—who failed to stand up at that moment!! I noticed that the Television media kept talking about her possible private life with the boy etc., albeit with suitable disclaimers! Let’s visualise for a moment the plight of the family that has to handle the social repercussions of such non-verified perceptions, in addition to coping with the loss of the dear one!! Similar things happen when one faces such a scenario with groups with negative motives!

In the last year or so, in some of my counselling sessions, I had to deal with such victims—in one case, the morphing was done using a group of simple images shot during a family wedding event!! Although, one can ascertain the validity of such images/videos using different technologies and come out totally clean, it is usually too late by the time the truth is ascertained—with the emotional damages already done!! In some extreme cases, the victims who could not handle the emotional turmoil have even ended their lives, leaving their families in dire straits!!

In one such counselling session, I asked the victim,

“Why can’t you stand up and fight, when the truth is on your side?”

The victim said,

“It is very easy to advise others on standing up and fighting—I am not sure if you would stand up and fight if this were to happen to you!!”

I realised that any answer I give the victim, at that time, would be purely academic in nature and in the process I was put into deep introspection too!

It is a fact that, even the smallest blot on ones "Character" is almost a permanent one—many times non-erasable! The human predators seem to know this fact deeper than many victims may realise. Let’s also be more discreet in our “likes/forwards” or in our funny comments, on such posts—as we might be contributing forever, to the mess in someone’s life.

At a deeper level, we need to watch our own Conduct in general (public or private)… If this one aspect is taken care of, the likely blots can be substantially reduced.

I would like to close this post with a powerful quote:

“Intelligence shines through Knowledge—Education sparkles through Conduct”.

Guest Interactions with a Child

I am mostly left to wonder when I watch a guest interact with a child!!

I hear the three standard questions asked to a child when a guest meets the child (in the same sequence):

1. What’s your name?
2. Which class are you in?
3. Which school do you go to? 

I wonder because mostly the guest is lost on how to interact further, after the three questions are answered!

I have also seen the reactions of the child to these questions and the child is mostly relieved that she is granted permission to leave after the three questions!! Thank God! The embarrassment is over!

Let’s go over the entire interaction a little more in detail.

After the first question is answered, the response of the guest is usually something like, “Oh! Lovely”, “Good”, “Hmmmn”… The child, I am sure, is left wondering, "what’s good about my specific name!"

The second question is interesting in a different way. There are 3 possibilities:

1. The child looks smaller than usual for her class
2. The child looks larger than usual for her class
3. The child looks normal (in the eyes of the guest!)

The response of the guest to the child’s answer in each case is something like, 

“Oh! 4^th Standard! Wow!” 

or 

something like, “You said 2^nd? Oh!”…

In either case, the child feels that something is wrong with her! Not a good situation to be in!

Regarding the third question, there are 2 possibilities:

1. The school name is very familiar to the guest
2. The school name is not familiar to the guest 

The response of the guest to the child’s answer is something like, 

“Oh! Great!” 

or 

“Which school? Come again?”… 

In the first case, the child feels special, BECAUSE of the school (not because of something special ABOUT HER) and in the second case, the child feels low again!

At this point, usually, one of the parents would intervene and say something like, “She is attending music class or dance class etc.”… Then the guest says, “Really?”… The child thinks, “Of course! You think my parent is telling lies?”… Then the adult asks, “Can you sing a song for me?”; the child wonders, “Why should I? He doesn’t seem to know music!”

Lucky every child has the maturity not to say the thoughts aloud!! Blessed guests!

Sometimes, the parent says, “She is a topper in her class”! Then the guest says, “Great! Keep it up!” (many times, in such a scenario, the guest feels low or says something like, “even my son is a school topper” and ends up feeling better--after all, who is going verify!!).

If you closely observe the entire interaction (which is almost always repeated with every guest!!), the child is made to ONLY respond to precise close-ended questions and also to do just what is told!! Of course, if the child chooses to exercise her free-will to refuse to do what is told, she would face disciplinary action after the guest leaves since the parent feels that their child has brought down his/her pride and prestige!! 

There are times, when the child takes a little more time to respond to the standard questions, may be because she is frustrated at such interactions or because she is angry at her own helplessness on such situations—and the parent prods the child very quickly to respond—wondering why is my child so slow in response (not realizing that the problem could be genetic!!!)

The harsh truth in this whole scenario is that the guest lacks “conversation skills” and the parent lacks “parenting skills”!!

The child is indeed perfectly okay!

I have surely made similar blunders, as a guest/parent, and I have thought through it.

Some years ago, after my enlightenment (!!), I tried something different when I went to my friend’s house and he introduced his 8-year young daughter. I said, “You name must be Angel! You look like one!”… First, I noticed that the child was taken aback at NOT being asked a question! Then I saw the child feeling shy and good about herself; she said, “No, my name is Sruti!”. But, I could see that she way visibily happy!

I said, “I will still remember you as Angel and call you so. Is it okay?”… I deliberately avoided questions on her school and class; I also sat on the floor, met her eye-to-eye, smiled and gave a nice high-five and moved on…

Apparently, Angel keeps asking her father when I would visit again!! 

We all have the responsibility to build Self-esteem in not just our own children but also in every child we interact with, through every interaction.

“Our children are not our children. They are creations of cosmic longing to express in different ways!!”

~~ adapted from Khalil Gibran’s work

Draupati Vastraharan and Corporate Characters

Let me describe the specific scene in Mahabharat first…

Dharma has a temptation to play the Game of Dice and on invitation from Dhuriyodan, he sets out to play. He loses all his material possessions, then he pledges his brothers, then himself and then finally pledges his wife Draupati. He loses her too due the wickedness of Sakuni. At this point, I do not want to discuss if Dharm had rights to pledge his brothers and his wife--I will keep it for a future discussion!!

Now that Draupati is won over, Dhuriyodan, orders his brother Ducchasan to bring her to the open court and strip her of her dresses. Ducchasan drags her by her hair and starts to strip her. She prays to Lord Krishna who promptly helps her by his magic act done REMOTELY (the saree that she wore keeps growing and growing). Finally, Ducchasan is fed up, tired and gives up.

The whole episode happens in the court led by Duriyodhan’s father, Dhirudhirashtra. The court also has Bhishma, Vithura, Karna, Dhuriyodan’s brothers, Kripacharya, Drona and many others.

No one raises an objection, except Vikarna, Dhuriyodan’s much younger brother. He objects very strongly and he is asked by Dhuriyidan to get out of the court. He leaves promptly, feeling angry and helpless!

Bhisma, Vithura, Kripacharya and Drona close their eyes and repent silently. After Ducchasan gives up, Draupati asserts herself and asks very valid questions, directly to the king, Dhirudhirashtra. Being moved by her emotions, the leader, Dhirudhirashtra grants her a lot of goodies. She is not keen to take any favours and asks for releasing her husbands and their weapons.

The above scene correlates to many corporate houses today. The leader is “Visionless” (like Dhirudhirastra!) and has his own biases (like Dhirudhirashtra’s bias for his son). He is unable to oppose whatever his son does!

In many corporate houses, we do find Visionless leaders with their own “blue-eyed boys”… There are many seniors who know what is right and what is wrong, but they choose to keep quiet and watch the happenings mutely. Some may choose to “keep away” and justify to themselves that they are not party to the injustice, since they were away!! They regret and repent, within themselves, without explicit objections, at the right time.

Some juniors in the ranks demonstrate courage and state brutal facts and they are promptly sidelined.

Some people, who are unconnected to the corporate decisions, get victimised (like Draupati). Many such victims seek “external” support. The people who can help (like Lord Krishna), choose to “stay away” and help—without getting into the court of madness.

Everyone gets into a mode of revenge; the root cause can never be identified. Like, Karna behaved badly, because Draupati rejected him albeit he as the first one to lift the bow during her Swamvara. Dhuriyodhan was insulted by Draupati in the Magic Palace; She calls him a “Blind Man’s Son” when he fell down in the Magic Palace. Both Duriyodhan and Karna takes their revenge in the court. Bhima vows to kill Ducchasan in a very barbaric manner. Arjun vows to kill Karna. Nakul vows to kill Sakuni.

The funny thing is that NO ONE vows to punish the silent seniors, who had the formal role, freedom and responsibility to stop the madness, but stayed action-less!! They went scot free!!!

This happens in many corporate houses, wherein there are many seniors who are competent enough to undo a wrong decision or bring in a new policy, but choose to keep quiet (due to their own insecurities), harming the entire company and specifically the unconnected victims!!

The Visionless Leader is also, many times, spineless in taking tough decisions; he also chooses not to consult the experienced ones, BEFORE action. There are many Sakunis who play a lot of political games and influence the key people for their own gains/personal agendas. Many senior leaders get influenced by such political games.

Dhuriyodhan, who has limited formal authority, takes many decisions in the court; this is true in many corporate houses too… wherein the “blue-eyed-boys” take many decisions without authority, since the formal leader is Visionless and is biased. Some times, such people are wrongly referred to as being in “fast track”!!

Gandhari, wife of Dhirudhirashtra, comes to the court and fights for Draupati, She doesn’t have any formal powers. She questions the Adharma and pleads for justice. People listen to her due to her astounding credibility and moral character. But, she makes very little impact, overall!

It is actually an interesting exercise to do a Root-cause Analysis for the Mahabharata war!! One may not know how far back one needs to go to identify the root cause!!

Before the stripping act, Dhuriyodhan sends a messenger to Draupati; she sends him back with questions and he goes up and down a few times just carrying messages from one to another!! There are many such senior managers in corporate houses, who just act as a relay station between the top management and people down the line. They take no real responsibility, but ends up gossiping in the coffee-room!!

Finally, not all victims take injustice lying down! Some ensure that the whole kingdom is brought down—like Draupati did!!

Vibheshan or Karna (Commitment or Loyalty)?

In my previous blogpost, I had shared my thoughts about “Commitment” being over-valued than competence. In this blogpost, I am discussing Commitment, as I understand.

Commitment is to a cause (or Dharma), whereas Loyalty is to a person or organization.

Today, many corporate houses talk about Customer Loyalty, Employee Loyalty etc… Loyalty is also rewarded much more than Commitment.

I feel strongly that Commitment has to be nurtured more than Loyalty.

I am taking a few pages from our epics Ramayan and Mahabharat to express my thoughts…

In Ramayan, when Ravan abducted Sita, Vibheshan (Ravan’s brother), felt it was against Dharma and decided to act. He was fully committed to Dharma.

He took the right actions and in the right sequence too…

• He approached Ravan directly and requested him to return Sita to Rama. (first step: direct feedback)
• Finding no results, he talked to Ravan’s wife Mandodari, and requested her to talk to Ravan. (next steps: approaching influencers)
• Finding no results, he then spoke to Ravan’s sons.
• Finding no results, he approached the Council of Ministers and asked them to influence Ravan. (next step: approach formal roles, who are duty-bound to offer feedback)
• Then, finally, his commitment to Dharma overweighing, he left Lanka and joined Rama, where he found Dharma. (finally, when all else fails, take a firm stand and act)

Without Vibheshan’s commitment to Dharma, Rama could not have won the war; given that Vibheshan shared very critical information about Ravan and his team, at different times; like information about Ahi/Mahi Ravan, or during the final encounter, sharing about Ravan’s boons etc… (Never allow emotions to interfere with your actions that are attached to Dharma)

Quite unfortunately, in our culture, we value Loyalty much more than Commitment. We have branded Vibheshan as a traitor—no one names ones son as Vibheeshan, in our culture!!

In Mahabharat, Karna was Loyal to Dhuriyidhana. He sided with Adharma, knowing full well about the Dharmic principles. His Loyalty to Dhuriyodhana was also not complete! He promised his mother that he would not kill anyone other than Arjuna—not a fair promise to make, being on the other side!!

Many of us seem to value Karna in high-esteem than Vibheshan!! I am perplexed on our stand-points!!

In my consulting experience, I have come across many Corporate Leaders who prefer Loyalists than people who are actually committed to the Vision/Mission as set by the Board. These committed people, rock the boat, express opposing points of view vocally, stick to high personal standards on matters of ethics etc., at different times and are also victimized at some point—whereas, Loyalists get away with accolades by merely supporting their bosses!!

Time to think for ourselves as Leaders!!